But the battle is not really about creation vs. evolution. While
the debate could be construed as part of a larger struggle between science and
religion, even that is an inadequate framing of the issue. To talk about a
struggle between science and religion would be like referring to a struggle
between science and art, science and poetry, science and music. The fact is
humans use a variety of intellectual tools and creative expressions to uncover and
express profound truths about the world. Each approach provides a different
lens through which the mysteries of origin, process, meaning and value in the
world are discovered and explored.
The real battle is not between creation and evolution or
between science and religion. What those presidential candidates were really
voting for was a particular approach to understanding and interpreting
scripture—in this case the opening chapters of bereshit, the Book of Genesis. That’s where the real battle line is
drawn: the Bible as a scientific treatise vs. the Bible as a work of
art.
Traditionally, Jews understand the Torah, the Pentateuch,
the five books of Moses, as the word of God revealed to the Jewish people on
Mt. Sinai. It contains narratives that portray the origins of the universe and
of human civilization, as well as the Jewish people’s origins as a religious
community living in a covenant relationship with God. It also contains mitzvot,
“instructions” or “commandments,” that outline a pattern of life representing
our fulfillment of the covenant relationship.
Modern Jews, not unlike other religious people in the modern
world, confront a perplexing dissonance between the depiction of events in the
Bible and the view of cosmology and history that we are all taught in school.
Perhaps the most vivid example of this dissonance is the narrative describing
the creation of the universe in the opening chapters of the Book of Genesis.
The six-day process of creation--the emergence of plants and animals, including
humans, instantly in a single day--stands in sharp contrast to the scientific
view of a 15 billion-year-old universe, the Big Bang Theory and theories of the
evolution of the species. What are we to believe?
We often hear that religious people must accept the Bible’s
version of events--that these events actually occurred in actual space and in
actual time. If we are scientific people, then we must reject the Bible as
nothing but a collection of myths and fairy tales. Yet this apparent conflict
between religion and science emerges from a misreading of the Bible and a
misunderstanding of the power of narrative to reveal profound truths. Just as
art, music, or poetry provide us with an awareness of reality otherwise
imperceptible to our five senses, religious narrative has the ability to unveil
the mystery of God’s presence in the universe, God’s relationship to the world
and to humanity.
When we turn to the account of creation depicted in Genesis,
we find that there are actually two stories, which, in certain details,
contradict one another. In Chapter 1, adam, Adam, literally “the earth
creature,” is the pinnacle of creation, the last act in an increasingly complex
process of creation. In chapter 2, the human is created first. “There you have
it,” gloats the rationalist scientific skeptic. “How can the Bible be true when
it contradicts itself?”
In many of his so-called “studio paintings,” Picasso depicts
the artist looking both into and out of his painting. Which is true? Can a
person look in two opposite directions at once? The fact is both are true. The
artist projects himself—his soul, his creativity—into the work of art, and is
then affected by the art that he projects. The artist both creates the work of
art and is created by it.
The first chapter of Genesis provides the cosmic view of
creation—a drama seen from above. Here is a hierarchical universe with God as
transcendent, omnipotent commander and organizer. God creates by word, by will,
by design, by idea, the way an architect would create. The second chapter is
naturalistic—a drama played out on earth. God is imminent, interacting directly
with creation. God is the potter, fashioning the human creation; the
surgeon/physician, matchmaker, companion, who walks in the garden and speaks to
the creatures.
So which is true? Is God imminent or transcendent? Is God an
architect or a potter? Does God command from on high, or does God walk in the
garden? The fact is these two stories are told in order to reveal two
concomitant aspects of God. God is both master of the universe and the healer
of shattered hearts; creator of heavenly lights and one who remains faithful to
those who sleep in the dust; enthroned on high, but concerned with those down
below; in heaven and on earth. Two stories are required to propound this
paradoxical but profound understanding of God as both imminent and
transcendent.
But the insight that these two parallel narratives impart
goes beyond the complex nature of divinity. They also provide us an important
clue as to the manner in which God and humans interact. They offer an important
bridge—a nexus—between the human and the divine.
In the first chapter of Genesis, not only space—the physical
universe—is created. Time, too, is created. That is the function of the six-day
format: not to tell us that the universe was created in six days, but to
indicate that time is an aspect of the created order of the universe. Twice
daily, Jews praise God as ha-mehaddesh betuvo bekhol yom tamid ma’aseh
vereshit, “the one who, through the attribute of goodness, daily and
continuously renews the act of creation.” The universe was not created in six
days. The universe is recreated every day. What the six-day structure teaches
us is that built into the universe is a sacred pattern of six days of creation.
Moreover, the creation of humanity does not conclude the act of creation in Chapter 1. Rather, the creation of humanity is followed by the pronouncement of Shabbat, the Sabbath, the seventh day. Indeed, this pronouncement forms a narrative bridge between the two creation stories—between the depictions of God as transcendent and imminent. Two powerful elements of religious vocabulary stand out in this short passage. “God blessed the seventh day and declared it holy.”
These two words—blessed and holy--hold the key to
understanding our relationship to God. They form the bridge between God’s
transcendence and God’s imminence, between heaven and earth. Just as God
blessed the seventh day, humans also have the power to bless. Indeed, as
popularized by the Rabbi in the Broadway play, “Fiddler on the Roof,” “there is
a blessing for everything.” By reciting berakhot, “blessings,
benedictions,” to accompany all of the mundane acts of living and experiencing
the world, we become conscious of God’s presence in the world and in our lives.
But what about holiness? The same berakhot that express our awareness of God’s presence also tell us that God is the One asher kiddeshanu be-mitzvotav, “who sanctifies us, makes us holy by means of God’s mitzvot.” That is, by performing mitzvot, by living our lives in accordance with God’s will, God’s plan for us as members of a religious community, a covenant people, we serve as channels for the divine presence to flow through the world. Through our awareness of God’s presence and through our actions in accordance with the divine will and plan for humanity, the transcendent God becomes imminent.
These stories are not scientific. They have more in
common with a Picasso painting than with a paper presented to the National
Academies. They are not meant to tell us how many days it took God to create
the world or even how the world came to be. Whether humans appeared in an instant
or over hundreds of thousands of years; whether we appeared spontaneously as
fully human or evolved from lower forms of life; whether we were created first
or last, the stories tell us that humans have a unique and crucial role in
bridging God’s transcendence and God’s imminence, thereby bringing God’s
blessing and holiness into the world. That, for me, is the meaning of bereshit, Genesis.
Return to Blog Home Page
Return to Blog Home Page
No comments:
Post a Comment