But the battle is not really about creation vs. evolution. While
the debate could be construed as part of a larger struggle between science and
religion, even that is an inadequate framing of the issue. To talk about a
struggle between science and religion would be like referring to a struggle
between science and art, science and poetry, science and music. The fact is
humans use a variety of intellectual tools and creative expressions to uncover and
express profound truths about the world. Each approach provides a different
lens through which the mysteries of origin, process, meaning and value in the
world are discovered and explored.
Religious humanism is not secular humanism. Religious humanism does not deny the presence of the divine in the cosmos and in the mind, heart and soul of humans. Religious humanism does, however, understand religion as a human endeavor to comprehend what is ultimately incomprehensible and to express the ineffable. Read more on the "Religious Humanist Manifesto" Page.
Showing posts with label Creation vs. Evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creation vs. Evolution. Show all posts
Monday, June 25, 2012
Creation vs. Evolution—NOT!
Between watching the presidential candidates respond to
questions concerning their views on evolution during the 2008 presidential debates,
hearing the calls for a theocracy from Republican candidates for the presidency
in 2012 and reading reviews of Gail Collins’ new book about battles on the
Texas School Board, one could easily have forgotten that the Scopes “monkey”
trial seemed to have settled the question back in 1925. That 87 years later
Americans are still arguing over creation vs. evolution seems the ultimate
anachronism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)