Sunday, September 22, 2013

Is the Pope a Religious Humanist?

Summary:

Pope Francis gave a remarkable interview last month to a group of Catholic journalists. Much has been made of the pope’s remarks in the mainstream media, focusing mainly on the significance of these remarks as they relate to hot-button social issues. But based on the pope’s fresh understanding of the relationship of the Church to the human community, the secondary role of doctrine, the unfolding and evolving nature of the divine presence in human experience and the critical role of doubt as part of the human quest for God, I believe Pope Francis could be identified as a religious humanist.

The full text:

Just last month, Pope Francis spent three days speaking with Catholic journalists. The full interview was conducted in Italian by Antonio Spadaro, S.J., editor in chief of La Civiltà Cattolica, the Italian Jesuit journal, and published in English in the journal America, the National Catholic Review. The interview has been widely covered in major American newspapers, including The New York Times and The Washington Post.

Much of the mainstream media coverage has attempted to focus on the pope’s comments regarding hot-button social issues like abortion, contraception and homosexuality. Frank Bruni’s op-ed in The New York Times for September 22 lauds the pope’s humility. But all of these issues are sidebars, peripheral to the main thrust of Francis’ remarks.

What strikes me most in the interview is the way the pope articulates an understanding of the religious life and the religious quest that seems to reflect much of the religious humanism that I have been struggling to articulate in this blog. For this pope, the center of religious life is the individual human being as part of a human community. Consider, for example, the way Francis comes to understand the infallibility of the Church, which he describes as a spiritual journey undertaken by all the faithful. It is this ongoing collective journey of the people of faith accompanied by the Holy Spirit that is infallible, not the institution of the Church or the person of the pope. Pope Francis declares,

“The people itself constitutes a subject. And the church is the people of God on the journey through history, with joys and sorrows. Thinking with the church, therefore, is my way of being a part of this people. And all the faithful, considered as a whole, are infallible in matters of belief, and the people display this infallibilitas in credendo, this infallibility in believing, through a supernatural sense of the faith of all the people walking together.

If I understand the pope correctly, he asserts here that divine truth is revealed not in hierarchical doctrine handed down by authorities as a way of controlling human thought and behavior. Rather, divine truth emerges from the community of the faithful entering into dialogue with one another and with their spiritual leaders as together they make what the pope calls the “journey through history.”

Francis offers a fresh perspective on the role of doctrine in the Church. “The people of God want pastors,” the pope insists, “not clergy acting like bureaucrats or government officials.” He understands that the Church needs to reach people in their deepest aspirations, their deepest concerns and fears. It is the duty of the church to bring a message of God’s love for humanity, and it is this message that precedes any doctrinal imperative. Indeed, any doctrinal imperative can only proceed from this sense of God’s love and the Church’s duty to bring to the community of faith the hope that God’s love inspires. 
The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently… But the proclamation of the saving love of God comes before moral and religious imperatives. Today sometimes it seems that the opposite order is prevailing.”
He acknowledges and celebrates the historical process, the historical journey that a people of faith undertakes and the religious and spiritual dynamic that emanates from the process. Religious awareness and understanding are not static. The way we have understood God and the divine/human relationship evolves just as other historical and intellectual processes evolve.
“We must not focus on occupying the spaces where power is exercised, but rather on starting long-run historical processes. We must initiate processes rather than occupy spaces. God manifests himself in time and is present in the processes of history. This gives priority to actions that give birth to new historical dynamics. And it requires patience, waiting.”

In addition, there is no room for a notion of absolute certainty  in Francis’ conception of the human quest for God. Doubt is an essential ingredient inasmuch as doubt leads us to further discernment and a more intense desire to continue the journey.
“If a person says that he met God with total certainty and is not touched by a margin of uncertainty, then this is not good. For me, this is an important key. If one has the answers to all the questions—that is the proof that God is not with him... Uncertainty is in every true discernment that is open to finding confirmation in spiritual consolation.”

Religious truth is uncovered as part of the spiritual quest undertaken by the people of faith. That truth is not primarily concerned with doctrine, but with a message of love and hope—a message of a divine/human connection which allows the individual human and the human community to share a sense of meaning, purpose and value in a cosmic, transcendent context and to participate in an unfolding process of realizing and expressing divinity and sacredness in the world and in human experience. Yet, this remains a human experience, subject to doubt and uncertainty. At the same time, it is precisely this doubt and uncertainty that encourages further human discernment as the quest, the journey, continues. Only that ongoing quest can be considered infallible.

Yes, I think Pope Francis is a religious humanist.

No comments:

Post a Comment